Best file system for SSD?


Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/styllloz/public_html/qa-theme/donut-theme/qa-donut-layer.php on line 274
0 like 0 dislike
5 views
There are SSD drive to use for database (Postgres) under Debian Lenny.


Came to the conclusion that the most suitable standard from FS is ext2.


Is it really so?
by | 5 views

6 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
In PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance it is not recommended to use SSD due to the fact that they write cache is always present in one form or another, and practically guaranteed data integrity during a sudden power outage. Data is written to the SSD large blocks greater than the block size of the file system, so the controller needs to cache written data in any way. And no SSD manufacturer does not guarantee that the data will be written entirely after you perform a fsync or when you disable caching. SSD can ignore all such attempts.
\r
As file system it is recommended XFS. It is written that it is almost the same as ext3 in writeback mode in terms of reliability, but a bit faster (there are benchmark results of the author).
\r
In General, I recommend reading, there are a lot of valuable information and the choice of drives and RAID, what pitfalls there are in each case.
by
0 like 0 dislike
EXT4.
by
0 like 0 dislike
btrfs with-o ssd
by
0 like 0 dislike
by
0 like 0 dislike
At the moment — екст4.
This question was already asked in the FAQ on habré.
by
0 like 0 dislike
ext2 — it will be pretty fast, but it is also without history... If the UPS is, it is possible and ext2, if not then look in the direction ext3 (after all, ext4 is less resistant to sudden blackouts), you can still look at xfs.
by

Related questions

0 like 0 dislike
4 answers
0 like 0 dislike
1 answer
0 like 0 dislike
3 answers
0 like 0 dislike
4 answers
0 like 0 dislike
4 answers
110,608 questions
257,186 answers
0 comments
28,049 users