The mechanism of 5 units of karma?


Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/styllloz/public_html/qa-theme/donut-theme/qa-donut-layer.php on line 274
0 like 0 dislike
3 views
A lot recently on habré became questions concerning the impossibility of writing due to lack of karma. "How to write?", "Why can't I write an interesting article?", etc.


The idea of such restrictions more likely correct than not. But the cancellation of the personal blogs and the inclusion of a minimum threshold of 5 units of karma, in fact, killed most of the capabilities of writing good articles and influx of new authors.


I have in profile 2 of the article: transfer, which gathered 42 plus and any plus sign in karma, and the article about his project, which have gathered 5 of the minuses and minuses about the same in karma. Perhaps the sample is not representative, but it still may describe a trend: the pros put only at personal request, and the cons just.


So this issue (and the topic create a poll I can't: ) I propose to share ideas on improving the mechanism of restrictions on writing posts.


Beginning with my proposal: there should be a special blog in which people can publish a post with any karma, even negative. It can be called whatever you like, "Personal blogs" for example. The articles in this blog can't go on the main page, but when you set a certain number of advantages to the article, the author can move it to blog. This sandbox is only for already registered users.
by | 3 views

7 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
Then you need to make the N-th number of advantages for the article was added 1 unit to karma, so you can do with the rating.
by
0 like 0 dislike
earlier in the basement of a topic next to the plus/minus for the top was a green button in the form of an arrow pointing up. It was handed down "button to raise his karma to the author of" to lazy didn't have to go to the profile for plus. Good thing was, then 10-15 pros in the topic "converted" in one plus in karma, because for many it was easier to click another arrow. Then it was removed, such as to avoid distortions. But really now skewed the other way, because the cons are more active, as a rule, the pros.
But to argue with a UFO is useless, so I scored a bolt on it.
by
0 like 0 dislike
I think you should at least be given the opportunity to write in personal blogs. About an extra button on the end of the post for raising the karma can only dream.
by
0 like 0 dislike
Well, there is — habrahabr.ru/blogs/personal/but I'm not sure if you can write at zero karma
\r
And the fact that the pros it put really very rare, even if the article +50-100, it is unfortunately the case.
by
0 like 0 dislike
I agree. With the pros in the cons slide easily, lifting the same — almost impossible on our own.
by
0 like 0 dislike
Alas, all such topics have a lot of common sense, alas they are not effective. The resource administration does not listen, and did not even read any suggestions for improvement. All decisions are taken by a narrow circle of people, and the priorities are sorted according to the predicted financial returns. The user experience, the quality of the material, and other prettiness, have by definition a low priority. You may think that my words just the delirium of the sick person, but the practice unfortunately shows that I'm probably right.
by
0 like 0 dislike
"Even negative", in my opinion, superfluous. Zero.
by

Related questions

0 like 0 dislike
7 answers
asked Mar 25, 2019 by wise_gopher
0 like 0 dislike
6 answers
0 like 0 dislike
7 answers
0 like 0 dislike
1 answer
asked May 21, 2019 by AngReload
0 like 0 dislike
4 answers
asked Mar 25, 2019 by foxgray
110,608 questions
257,186 answers
0 comments
27,942 users