Google vs Microsoft?

0 like 0 dislike
4 views
I will not original if I raise the topic again. But still I want to ask smart people.

Two organizations operate under the same sky, breathe the same air, eat the same burgers. They are all capitalists. Perhaps even employees repurchased from each other. For example, I enjoy using products from both companies.

And how many reviews, articles not read, so still not understood. Why many try to present Google is good and Microsoft is evil or Vice versa. They say first of all strangles, Google also helps. A kind of good knight – robs the rich and gives to the poor. Why. Why do you have to divide into black and white.

What do you think, maybe it's just the positioning? Especially injected us, the consumers, misleading?

Thank you.
by | 4 views

7 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
Because Microsoft is the evil Corporation. Google does not give bribes, do not buy psevdoissledovaniya on the topic "Google is 42% better than Bing" uses in its work methods FUD and Embrace, extend and extinguish, do not spread blatant lies on their official website, not name-calling of competitors... of Course, this does not mean that Google is good, but compared to assholes from the Microsoft Corporation it looks good.
by
0 like 0 dislike
I don't know why I formed this opinion, but IMHO MS
— use proprietary formats instead of open, Google — on the contrary opens their achievements and uses the industry standards
— binds its users to their products, complicating or making impossible to integrate with them. Google, on the contrary publishes an API to their products and actively develops
\r
and so on in the same spirit. In General they have different policies and I personally like the policy of Google nicer.
by
0 like 0 dislike
The main reason: someone wants to stand out and they are the type of cooler the rest, because I do not use MS products.
\r
MS:
1. Most of the users for many years surrounded by MS products when working with a PC — different inevitable shoals are accumulated in the user memory.
2. Strong Windows applications that are written for it — the shoals of these applications, users find shoals MS.
3. Users often (when not pirates) obviously MS paid.
4. Legacy compatibility many MS products, because of the popularity of these products it is not possible to stop supporting compatibility.
\r
Google:
1. More difficult to notice the contradictions in the answer of the search (about the OS I don't know, so I can not say, and the search engine is the main source of Google's income).
2. Third party apps are very few (for Android just like they are pre-tested as an Apple, try to arrange such a thing for all software under Windows)
3. The user explicitly pays Google.
4. Products not so much, and among them a full-fledged PC OS, IDE, Office, etc.
5. Maintaining foods easier, because they are in the Internet are mainly represented by the GUI and the mechanics of working can be replaced on their servers.
\r
I wouldn't say that Google makes a new, MS — no. All over, just Google any younger here and is associated with newness. And all the giants often buy the wrong solution (the OS it was purchased).
by
0 like 0 dislike
Perhaps this is a consequence of the fact that Google typically develops new products itself, but Microsoft often takes created by other solutions, a little improves and sells.
by
0 like 0 dislike
>>What do you think, maybe it's just the positioning? Especially injected us, the consumers, misleading?
I beg you, companies that do not give up, they just need a positive image and all. All of these "corporations of good and evil" up with the people themselves, because they WANT someone good, and someone bad, this is such a dislocation of psychology.
For this reason, by the way, a lot of MS-haters, both among those who use its products, and among those who do not use.
Those who use a guided "but Windows/office/server pirate will deliver — to gates/MS N bucks to throw, they're bad!!!", but why are they bad if they are satisfied and they enjoy to can not explain.
Those who do not are guided by "but anything will do, though as anyone will Dodge, though generally will not do anything if you don't, but I won't use [MS products], they're bad!!!", because are is to recognize that not so bad, but this is akin to betrayal of himself.
by
0 like 0 dislike
And what if the smartest people are trying to give the company good or evil? And all competitors whether they are or is it fiction?
by
0 like 0 dislike
Everything is quite simple. Baboutmost of the products Goggle free, Microsoft — paid.
by

Related questions

0 like 0 dislike
1 answer
0 like 0 dislike
4 answers
0 like 0 dislike
7 answers
0 like 0 dislike
2 answers
110,608 questions
257,186 answers
0 comments
28,715 users