MacBook or MacBook Pro?

Of Course Pro.

What is the application?
I bought the laptop, I knew a lot of the time he will stand on my Desk connected to an external monitor, and issues of heating me to soar will not. The choice was obvious.
At the same time, a friend also asked this question, the choice of the younger models, the MacBook or MacBook Pro. So we had an argument were: battery life and weight of the unit...
Performance, top view. Believe me, in everyday life the difference to the eye between similar models you will not see, but the fact that it seems "a bit" heavy, "faster" sit down, you will have to overcome each time.
Performance, bottom view. By selecting a model with a weak vidyuhi and postoyanno attaching an external monitor you'll be thinking...
\r
There's always a side view, just because I can't remember what specific differences there are now.

Windows book.

If the issue price is not worth it, then figley you ask. They only superficially look the same. I will not here give a comparison of the TX, but at home I have both beech and Pro I can play Starcraft 2 in native and not.
\r
And yet Pro has a backlight.

Pro matrix is much better

Take pro.
\r
1. Aluminum body (I already said).
2. Better matrix.
3. Regular MacBook runs only in 32 bit mode (or 32-bit kernelate), Pro — 64/32. For me, it is important, for example, Photoshop CS4/5 64 bit uses the resources of the video card, unlike 32-bit. Well, the future for 64 bits, all cases)) 4 GB of RAM, by the way, sees.

Take Pro, even if just because of the aluminum housing. Cute and Nadine!