Selection of cms for content sites?

Wordpress — For all its rules and ban the display of articles on with hundreds of plugins or five minutes of working with the code template.
\r
Wordpress is not demanding if you configure it correctly, for articles there are various caches, and also rules, there are plugins that will allow you to work on the clouds, if you have hundreds of thousands of users that you hostynem not do. And unless you have these numbers you can easily work with this CMS

modxcms.com
\r
Tasks:
>1) Publication of articles selected by the authors on the main page.
creates a select group that creates a block for output preview their articles, profit
>2) the publication of the articles selected by the authors in the special sections that are not displayed on the main.
similarly as for the main, just a block to output is in a template page specmasla.
with groups I'm not fussed — it is possible to have for each author to set his rights and designs available ACCOR (through the admin panel)
>3) Add static pages.
hmmm, I mean pure HTML, not tied to the engine — via download
>4) Commenting on articles registered users.
is via extra functionality
>5) Categorization of the articles.
cheto blunt is the appointment of spartakov to search for? if so is there
\r
Requirements:
>1) Speed.
5,000 document pages on shared hosting, with an average flow of users, rumor has it, is not retarded, but just in case better to check
>2) Simplicity.
on the left page tree, to the right of the data entry fields on the page
the separation of access rights for different users through user groups and for each individual
\r
there are two working versions of the product: Evolution, Revolution — the necessary functionality is there in both versions.
if necessary I can throw shots of the admin panels)

DLE quite suitable to your requirements, even without a file.

Suited for Drupal. In this case too =)

Joomla. It is quite user-friendly, good interface, simple, pleasant to work with. The system of "medium slow". Joomla have a lot of fans, and for good reason — under it is written a lot of modules that extend basic functionality. There is also something like a framework (framework) that allows you to add your own modules to extend the functionality. Notice that for more or less serious project, I would still have used drupal, because in terms of the internal structure of the system and its soundness, allocating user rights, he fits the role of a leader. However, Joomla is easier and friendlier to the user, in a way strongly reminiscent of a lightweight version of Bitrix. It works just fine. Configured pretty quickly. In General, well suited for content sites. The usual sites of business cards.

Ehpm

CMS Santafox ( www.santafox.ru/ )