Nikon D3100 vs Pentax K-x?

0 like 0 dislike
8 views
Help those to decide on a purchase.

At bourgeois forums write that:


Pentax K-x:

— Super mega high quality matrix

— cheap lens, there are cheap optics (something in the Internet-shops I did not notice)

— stabilizer in the body and not the lens


Nikon D3100:

— FullHD video at 24 frames autofocus.

— Nikon will be much easier to sell

— The matrix more than the K-x


Budget to 24990 re.

Looking forward to any comments and suggestions.
by | 8 views

6 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
As you know, Shinichi Nikon, Canon yellow, and Pentax shit.
Mail icon, what you write about Pentax owners pentaxa.
by
0 like 0 dislike
1. matrix size is the same (crop 1.5), and the Nikon only more malkopoulou (which as you know is not going to solve)
2. on Pentax cheap optics? tell that to those who dream of limo, in addition to the Nikon produces more third-party lenses (Sigma, Tamron...)
3. stab in the matrix well (as the owner of Sony say they, too, inside of the carcass), but if you have enough money to stabotel optics is even better.
4. pentaxa higher continuous shooting, but the Nikon range of compensation is higher and steeper than LCD
\r
in General, the camera characteristics are close, come to the store, hold both in your hands. which is better — and she is yours :)
by
0 like 0 dislike
Here the system needs to choose. If you then want to dramatically expand the set of optics, to buy a flash and other stuff, you can be surprised system Canon, Nikon and Pentax are very different. Under cheap optics from Pentax understand what bad optics from pentaks almost there. That is roughly the budget of the segment of optics is almost there. Everything besides pentaxa great compatibility with old lenses. The Nikon has several lenses burdeny (for example DX 35\\1.8), but all that higher level — is already just insane money.
\r
Total, Pentax K-x:
stabilizer for any optics, even for excavated in the closet Helios 44-2;
— Matariki AA or AA batteries;
— sometimes not very fast and accurate AF (but frankly not yuzal nikon);
— work with any optics ever produced pentaxim with the best possible set of features.
\r
Nikon 3100:
— should be the normal autofocus from Nikon;
— good selection of Park of optics, with one exception that is not AF-S optics will not autofocus, and extra-budgetary optics costs are astronomical money;
best choice external flashes among all the brands;
— the autofocus in video, which should be noted, pretty useless in real life.
\r
Talking about colors and stuff, I think it is useless. How many people, so many opinions. In addition, the RAW processing can easily equalize the chances of the images.
\r
From himself only add that taking the time pentax k-x fell in love with him. Yes he has his faults, but they are usually visible in comparison with top-carcasses other brands, while within the field more than normal. And Yes, read the Pentax club, there are many good and interesting people who can give a lot of information for thought.
by
0 like 0 dislike
As the owner of a Sony A700 with a stabilizer in the body — say — is very good. Depends of course on what shooting but shooting in the evening/night benefits greatly from this.
by
0 like 0 dislike
Lenses choose, and then the carcass. Budget carcass all about the same.
by
0 like 0 dislike
Definitely The Nikon. The 3100. The photo quality is amazing. Cheaper optics (e.g. 35/1.8 I have a great working piece of glass), color better the ratio will be different. And grow up — take serious optics.
by

Related questions

0 like 0 dislike
3 answers
0 like 0 dislike
7 answers
asked Mar 28, 2019 by ArbuzzzzZ
0 like 0 dislike
3 answers
0 like 0 dislike
1 answer
0 like 0 dislike
1 answer
110,608 questions
257,186 answers
0 comments
28,862 users